-->

Should Carolina claim Niclas Bergfors?

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

Yesterday afternoon, the Nashville Predators placed winger Niclas Bergfors on waivers. The former first round pick has spent the last three seasons with four different teams and has only two points in 11 games this season. Now, I know what you all are thinking right now. Why in the world would Carolina want someone with such atrocious stats? It should be worth noting that he was apparently in the doghouse with Barry Trotz in Nashville and was scratched for a few games and when he did play he was getting fourth line minutes.

Bergfors' point total over the last two seasons is underwhelming but he has posted very strong underlying numbers in those years. Last season, he scored 12 goals and 36 points in 72 games, but he was one of Atlanta's (where he spent most of the season) better forwards when it came to driving possession. Atlanta was not a strong possession team last year but Bergfors was able to at least get the puck into the opponent's zone and get shots on net on a consistent basis during his time there. Carolina is in a similar boat now as they have not been a great possession team either (team Fenwick w/ score tied is only 47.39%, third worst in the Eastern Conference), so having a player like this on the team has a lot of benefit. The team is also struggling to score at even strength and is very thin on the wings, so I have to believe that adding Bergfors can't hurt at all. He is also signed to only a one-year deal at $575k which means that Carolina would not be risking much if they do claim him.

Bergfors also scored 21 goals only two seasons ago when he spent time with the Devils and Thrashers. Therein lies this question. If he is so talented then why has he been traded twice in the last three years and waived by one of the worst possession teams in the league? Bergfors is noted for being "lazy" and "refusing to play defense" by a lot of people which could by why Trotz was not giving him a lot of ice time in Nashville. There could also be some other issues with him seeing how the Florida Panthers didn't even send a qualifying offer his way this summer when he was a restricted free agent.

I personally do not care about those problems because Carolina has plenty of defensively responsible forwards (Staal, Sutter, Dwyer, LaRose) and could really use a winger that can create chances and get shots on net on a regular basis. Bergfors is someone who can do just that and I see him as an upgrade over Anthony Stewart, who who may have three goals but has done next to nothing to create offense otherwise, to potentially play on the first line.

The one major thing standing in the way of me saying that we should claim Bergfors is that I think he will just end up like he did in Nashville. His possession numbers have been very bad this year but even if he does play well here, there's a good chance he could end up like Zach Boychuk and Zac Dalpe where he's pasted to the fourth line and playing only 3-7 minutes per game. That isn't going to do a lot of good for the team. Sure, it would be nice to have him on the first line but with the way Maurice has been distributing ice time, it doesn't look like that will happen. I still think it could be a good low-risk move for the Canes if they do claim Bergfors. If he gets a shot on the first line and works out, then it's a steal. If he flops or can't seem to get above the fourth line, then the Canes didn't lose anything from this experiment.

Is firing Maurice really necessary?

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

The "Mo Must Go" campaign seems to have hit a new high this season with the way the Hurricanes have been playing for the past month or so. I've heard every cliche and narrative tossed around during this time.

"Maurice has lost the team."
"The players aren't buying into his philosophy."
"The players have given up on him."
"It's time for a change."

While I haven't agreed with some of Maurice's decisions, I don't see what firing him at this point will accomplish. There are situations where I think a coaching change should be in order the usual case is when you have a very talented team that's underperforming. Carolina has plenty of talent but the only top-end players are Eric Staal, Jeff Skinner and maybe Joni Pitkanen. This team didn't exactly have great underlying numbers last year and most of their success was due to Cam Ward's great play. To make things worse, the team got a little weaker up front by subtracting Erik Cole so Ward's play was going to play a big factor into how the team would perform this year. Carolina is still struggling to score and prevent shots at even strength and Ward's save percentage is barely above .900 so that should tell you how things are going.

Is it Maurice's fault that Ward's play has regressed this year? No, but this doesn't mean that Ward is the reason the Canes are where they are in the standings. In a perfect world, the Canes wouldn't have to rely on Ward to steal so many games but they don't appear to have the horses up front to do that. The team's best scoring line consists of three natural centers and the only depth that was added at the wings over the off-season was Anthony Stewart and Alexei Ponikarovsky. I said that Poni could be a reasonable replacement for Cole but that obviously has not been the case at all. The defense corps has not changed that much either aside from the addition of Tomas Kaberle, who isn't going to help you much with shot suppression, and the emergence of Tim Gleason/Bryan Allen as a decent shutdown pair but the fact remains that this team still gives up a ton of shots nightly. Maurice doesn't control the make-up of this team but it is up to him to make the most out of it. I believe he and Dave Lewis have done that with the defense but the forwards are a work in progress. In fact, I would say that the Canes team as a whole are a work in progress and they aren't underachieving because of bad coaching. Their struggles are due to a lack of talent up front.

One other argument I've heard for Maurice's dismissal is that he isn't he right coach for this team. The Canes are rebuilding in a sense and have some organizational depth, but Maurice has barely been playing them at all. Maurice typically only rolls three lines with the fourth line getting less than 10 minutes per game and it's led some people to believe that Maurice can't work with younger players and the team would be betters suited with a coach like Jeff Daniels from Charlotte. I like to call this the "Andy Murray argument." This would be true except for one detail. Jeff Skinner was given top six minutes right off the bat in Carolina and it hasn't changed one bit. The same goes for Justin Faulk playing top-four minutes in nearly every game he's played for the Hurricanes this year. Granted, Skinner and Faulk have higher ceilings and have proven more in the NHL than Boychuk and Dalpe but you could argue that neither of those two have been given much of a chance here. That said, this isn't something that Maurice should be fired over. The team is rebuilding but it's not a full-out youth movement like in Edmonton and Ottawa, so I don't think that Maurice needs to be fired mid-season over not giving some younger players enough ice-time. 

Then there's the whole "the coach has lost the locker room" narrative which I will continue to believe is a fallacy and a lazy way of explaining how team isn't that good or they are just unlucky. It's mostly the former in Carolina's case, but they've seen some variable stats not swing their way this season. There's a lot of times where you'll have a team that is playing really well but the team doesn't win games because of poor goaltending or having their best goal-scorers go through incredible bouts of back luck. It's happened with an assistant coach in Montreal this year and it nearly cost Bruce Boudreau his job in Washington last season, but their GM kept a cooler head.

When Peter Laviolette was fired in 2008, the Canes were actually playing well territorially but sitting with a record that was near .500 because of some bad goaltending (.895 save %) among other things. Laviolette was then fired and Paul Maurice takes over where he only goes 12-10-3 for the next 25 games. The Canes were playing at about the same level during that time and were getting better goaltending. A lot of the wings came during the Canes second half surge where they won nine games in a row towards the end of March which was enough for them to solidify a playoff spot and you know how the rest of the story goes from there. What's interesting is that Carolina's territorial play didn't improve that much under Maurice for the rest of the 08-09 season but their save percentage improved to .928 which obviously had a big factor in the Canes winning more games in the second half. They were outshooting opponents more regularly that year and the wins starting to come once their goaltending turned around. I know some players had issues with Lavi, but it is pretty fascinating when you look at it this way.

Gabe from Arctic Ice Hockey recently did a study to see how much firing a coach impacts the team's Fenwick percentage and it showed that the improvement was very minimal (worth about half a win) so if a team was playing bad and fired their coach, not much would come of it. That's sort of the boat Carolina is in right now. They have one of the worst possession rates in the Eastern Conference and it's mostly due to a lack of talent. If Maurice were to be axed, it wouldn't change much. I would rather wait out the season to make a decision on the coaching position because we'll have a better idea of what the team wants to do then and there will be more names available.

Hurricanes Week 6 Performances (11/14-21)

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

The most recent week, there's been a lot of negativity surrounding the Carolina Hurricanes with the Canes going 1-3-0 and putting on one of their worst performances of the year against the Montreal Canadiens last Wednesday. They were also outscored 12-6 and shutout in two straight games which obviously put quite a draining on the fanbase. Believe it or not, the Canes actually had a strong Fenwick percentage of 56.1% with the score tied and the only truly awful performance they had was against Montreal. They outchanced both Buffalo and Toronto and were even with the Flyers when playing five-on-five. At even strength, Carolina was 55.3% in terms of scoring chances and I think it's a sign of good things to come after the brutal start this team got off to. A weak powerplay (one goa and 13 chancesl in 18 attempts) and sub-par goaltending (.908 EV save percentage) are still keeping this team down, but they can improve in the coming weeks if they keep outshooting opponents like they did this past week, minus the Habs game.

Carolina Hurricanes vs. Philadelphia Flyers 11/22/11 Scoring Chances

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

The Hurricanes have not seen a lot of bounces go their way this season which is why last night's game against the Philadelphia Flyers was a nice change of pace for this team. All season long they've been unlucky with goaltending, shooting and special teams but things finally seemed to go right for them in this game. They were outchanced by six shots at even strength but still managed to come out on top thanks to excellent goaltending from Cam Ward and the powerplay scoring two goals. Yes, you heard that right; the powerplay scored not once, but twice! The best part of it that both goals came relatively early in the powerplay so they were getting things done fast. 

If you recall, I have made points saying that the Canes were in the top-half of the league in shots per 60 minutes on the powerplay, which means that they couldn't be stuck on an 11% powerplay conversion rate forever. Over the last few games, I lost confidence because the team wasn't producing chances with the man advantage and figured their shot rate would decline with it. Then this game happened and they scored two quick goals, one of which came with the score tied. Those goals proved to be huge as they were arguably the main reason the Hurricanes left Philly with two points.

More after the jump

Carolina Hurricanes vs. Toronto Maple Leafs 11/20/11 Scoring Chances

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

Despite losing three in a row and five of their last six, there were good vibes all around the RBC Center tonight as the Hurricanes defeated the Toronto Maple Leafs 3-2. You would think that Carolina woudl have struggled in this game given the current state of their team and the Leafs 7-1 thrashing of the Washington Capitals the night before. Desipte that, the Leafs are a team who are dressing at least three AHL-level forwards right now, one AHL defenseman and were starting their third string goalie. They were also playing their second night of a back-to-back on the road, which usually doesn't bode well no matter who you are.

When you consider all of those points, the outcome of tonight's game shouldn't surprise too many people. The Leafs looked tired for most of the night and were outchanded 24-13 overall and only had five chances in the first two periods combined. The one thing that kept them in the game the whole time was goalie Ben Scrivens, who was really the only factor that prevented this game from being at least 4-0 before the end of the second period. Despite a third period surge from the Leafs, the Canes got the job done and it was backed by one of the strongest performances we've seen from the "top line" this year.

Reasons to be confident in Eric Staal

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

The Hurricanes captain has not been having a good season at all and he's fallen under harsh scrutiny from the most of the fanbase, myself included. With only four goals and eight points in 20 games played, everyone is wondering where the spark is from Eric Staal this season and if he's beginning to decline as a player. While I can agree that Staal's start to the year was brutal, he has been picking it up lately even though his point total does not indicate it.

We'll take a closer look at Staal's season after the jump.

Carolina Hurricanes vs. Buffalo Sabres 11/18/11 Scoring Chances

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

"My goal for the game: outshoot the opponent. Even if we don't win, I want to turn the game off knowing that this team tried and put forth a great effort. I sure as hell didn't have that feeling last game."- Me in yesterday's game preview

I really need to be careful what I wish for. The Canes outshot, outchanced and outplayed the Buffalo Sabres for a good portion of last night's game but they ended up losing 1-0 and haven't scored a goal in almost seven periods. It's rough times but I didn't think Carolina played that bad of a game last night and could have won had a few bounces gone their way. I also thought that the team could have done a better job at getting traffic in front of Buffalo goalie Jhonas Enroth. The team was generating chances, but Enroth saw most of them the entire way and that was a big factor.

Scoring chances & more after the jump

Game 20 Preview: Sabres at Hurricanes

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

Buffalo Sabres (11-7-0) at Carolina Hurricanes (6-10-3)
RBC Center, 7 p.m.
TV: FS-Carolinas, MSG-Buffalo

With the Canes coming off their worst performance of the season and speculations about whether or not head coach Paul Maurice will make it through Christmas, the common belief among Canes fans is that we are at rock bottom now and there is nowhere to go but up. While I agree that the team has been playing awful lately, things CAN get a lot worse than this. The Canes currently sit at 6-10-3 which is bad, but does anyone remember the time where we won only five games in October and November combined? Granted, the team was riddled with injuries then but that stretch felt a lot worse than the one the team is going through right now.

This has been a brutal November for this team. They have won only two games and have been outscored 32-16 during that stretch, outshot 269-221 and their powerplay is a miserable 3/33. I should also mention that the last time they scored on the powerplay was the 5-2 loss to Dallas which was five games ago. So, in a way, there is nowhere to go but up for this team because if they keep letting this happen then they could find themselves in Ducks or Blue Jacket territory sooner than they would like.

Lines, defense pairings & more after the jump

no comments

What is Jay Harrison's role?

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

Jay Harrison is a player who I have been following with interest all season. Going into training camp, I had him as someone who could have been lost on waivers because there were eight defensemen aiming to make the team. He ended up making the starting lineup and since then he has played on both the powerplay and penalty kill and has bounced around among the defense corps in terms of ice-time and assignments. He even found himself on the team's "shut-down" pair with Tim Gleason for a couple games, which is a huge assessment to what the coaches think of him. What I have been wondering is where Harrison fits the Hurricanes long-term. Can he be an all-around defenseman or a reliable shutdown guy? Or is he suited for a depth role in the bottom-pair? After the jump, we'll look at how he's been used this season and where he can fit long-term.

Carolina Hurricanes vs. Montreal Canadiens 11/16/11 Scoring Chances

Written by Corey Sznajder on .

This was a game that I would like to erase from my memory permanently if it were possible, but I have a job to and am here to share all of the ugly details of the 4-0 shutout the Canes endured at the hands of the Montreal Canadiens. I don't even need to get into scoring chances to illustrate how ugly this game was for Carolina because through the first 30 minutes, they were being outshot 25-6. They were going up against a team who is dressing three rookie defensemen, including one who was playing his first NHL game, and could only manage six shots through 30 minutes. Let that sink in for a minute. That is unacceptable no matter what team you are. The final stats don't look as ugly because the Canadiens decided to sit back in the third period while the Canes tried to muster up any offense they could to break the shutout. There's not much you need to do when you're leading 4-0 and outshooting a team 32-12 through two periods of play.

TSN color commentator Ray Ferraro called Carolina's play "one of the worst defensive efforts he has ever seen" and I am inclined to agree with him. Although, I felt that the forwards are much more to blame than the defense corps. So many forwards were guilty of lazy back-checking (Skinner on Subban's goal, for instance) and completely forgetting to tie up Montreal players in the neutral zone and it forced the defensemen into a lot of bad situations. To make things worse, the powerplay was lifeless yet again and Carolina wasn't creating much offense at even strength either when the game mattered. It was a pathetic game all-around and hopefully a wake-up call for a team that's now lost six of their last seven.

We'll revisit the disaster after the jump